To the English observer there is a romance to American political campaigns that is almost electric. Like British elections, but on Keroac. They conjure images of unlikely podiums erected in cornfields of oceanic proportions. Of improbable political outsiders gripping clipboards on turbulent January flights in New Hampshire. Of incessant polling data delivered by blackberries and punctuated only by hasty campaign sex in roadside hotels. My job as a campaign manager in England involved coercing old ladies into stuffing envelopes. It was a world of desiccated office furniture that leaked pale stuffing onto the carpet. When it came time for an election in Massachusetts, it was something I had to witness.
On election day the weather oscillated lazily from snow flurries to sheets of rain and everything both in and outside stank of stale ice. Puddles of half melted slush lined the roads, streaked with motor oil. My friend H and I had arrived in Charlestown to campaign for Martha Coakley, an underwhelming technocrat who was running on the democratic ticket to replace Ted Kennedy. A run of misguided comments about the Red Socks (the Massachusetts electoral equivalent of beheading a kitten on prime time television) had left her tumbling into electoral oblivion. The Coakley crew were camped out in the plush headquarters of a local chocolate manufacturing company in Charlestown. Wrapped snugly in spirals of freeway and surrounded by a moat of gangrenous snow, it was almost impossible to make our way there. Inside were self-contained pockets of frantic activity, separated by gulfs of empty, green-carpeted corridors and vacant reception desks. Men in shirts with laminated passes hanging from their necks were simultaneously doings things and looking like they were doing things.
We were hastily plugged into a machine that automatically dialed the numbers of registered democrats across the state. All we had to do was read from a doodle covered pre-prepared script encouraging them to vote. After a while I had the curious sense that I was using one of those “teach yourself French” computer programs, so great was the detachment between myself and the prospective voter and so robotic was the experience of listening and repeating.
As the polls closed we followed the flow of activists to the after-party in The Sheraton in downtown Boston. A sparse gathering of glum supporters and campaign workers walked in figures of eight talking on cell phones in front of a vacant podium. Defeat hummed in the air. So empty was the ballroom that I could have walked up to the front of the stage unimpeded and lain down in a star shape on the carpet. A TV the size of detached house kept cutting to footage of the Brown campaign HQ, where a wholesome dead-eyed guitar band milled around before a blanket of tiny American flags jittering epilectically with excitement. When the election was called for Brown people hardly seemed to notice.
This week the state resembled a shy and inarticulate man who had just experienced some exotic yet harmless trauma; a carjacking, say, or a narrow escape from a rabid dog and suddenly found himself the center of attention at a dinner party. Not quite knowing how to handle the curious gaze of an entire nation the citizens of Massachusetts went to the ballot with half a mind of on the solemn duty of casting judgment on Obama and the other half struggling to keep from breaking out in a rash of grins.
I won’t go into detail about why an almost unheard of state senator notable for driving a pick-up truck and fathering an American Idol finalist went on to beat a respected Attorney General who, only a few weeks ago, enjoyed a 31 point lead in the polls. Or why, in what many say is the most liberal state in America, during a period of national democratic supremacy, a Republican found himself elected to the US senate for the first since 1979. It was a complex, mystifying election, whose result eschews any single explanation. But I think a cry for global attention from a small state that no one can spell has something to do with it. The Boston Globe touched on this here.
We left before the concession speech. Unsurprisingly we had seen little of the Travelodges, war-busses and cornfields (particularly the former which, in the Boston metropolitan area, are few are far between anyway) of American campaign lore. Rather, I left with the nagging sense that politics all across the western world is the same. Merely a bleak pendulum swinging meaninglessly from center left to center right for decade after decade.












